<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Transactions on Andrea Bozzo | Blog</title><link>https://andreabozzo.github.io/AndreaBozzo/blog/en/tags/transactions/</link><description>Recent content in Transactions on Andrea Bozzo | Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.146.0</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 10:00:00 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://andreabozzo.github.io/AndreaBozzo/blog/en/tags/transactions/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>I tried to put data quality inside the commit. One pub(crate) stopped it.</title><link>https://andreabozzo.github.io/AndreaBozzo/blog/en/posts/commit-barrier-iceberg-blog/</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 10:00:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://andreabozzo.github.io/AndreaBozzo/blog/en/posts/commit-barrier-iceberg-blog/</guid><description>A profiler tells you the data is bad after it is already durable. So I tried to make the passing report a precondition of durability, on both Delta and Iceberg, with one trait. Delta worked. Iceberg could not express the commit at all — and the reason is four lines of visibility in a library, not anything in the spec.</description></item></channel></rss>